GB House Pipes
The Pipe Cam
Tools & Accessories
Back One Step
A Reader's Digest Special Report
What's Been Added to
Does it taste good? Yes or no, heed this warning:
unknown substances added to "safe" cigarettes may,
in fact, be as dangerous to your health as tar and
BY WALTER S. ROSS
Walter S. Ross, a Reader s Digest staff writer, is editor of World Smoking &
Health, an American Cancer Society journal.
CAN YOU NAME an American product that causes or contributes to 350,000
deaths per year, whose contents are almost totally secret and exempt from all
health regulations—yet has a government subsidy? The answer is, of course,
There are many goods whose misuse is dangerous, but it is hard to think of
anything comparable to tobacco products. There is no healthful amount of
smoking. Even a single cigarette is hazardous.
This is why health authorities for three decades have been concerned about the
secrecy over tobacco-product ingredients. When you buy packaged food or
pharmaceuticals, the contents are, by law, listed on the labels. Yet cigarettes,
always harmful, have no information about ingredients on their labels. Now
there are new reasons for concern about what might be in your cigarette.
Starting in the mid-1970s, in response to smokers' continuing demand for a
reduction in health risks, new low-tar and low-nicotine "light" brands of
cigarettes began appearing on the U.S. market. Lowering tar in cigarettes is
itself fairly easy: possibilities include mixing air in the smoke through ventilated
filters or perforated papers; narrowing the diameter of the cigarette and packing
it with less tobacco; using longer filters; breeding low-tar tobacco. But filters
and other devices alter flavor. The smoke becomes drier, losing much of its
body. Says Frederick J. Triest, veteran U.S. tobacco-industry flavor consultant:
"Regular smokers are accustomed to inhaling a certain amount of taste and
body. With low tar, the only way manufacturers can give it to them is in flavors
and fragrances." In other words, additives.
In 1979, the then Assistant Secretary for Health and U.S. Surgeon General
Dr. Julius B. Richmond became concerned about synthetic chemicals as well as
natural substances that were being added to tobacco. Although the latter are
generally selected from compounds considered safe to humans, a report on
smoking and health prepared by his staff noted, this did "not guarantee that the
subsequent products" would be safe when these ingredients were burned.
Since low-tar brands require beefed-up flavors, Dr. Richmond questioned
whether the manufacturers might be putting in more harm than they had
removed. It was known that, in skin-painting tests, the tar in at least one experi-
mental low-tar cigarette caused as many animal tumors as tar in the very highest
tar brand. Public Law 95-626 (Section 403) requires the Secretary of Health
and Human Services to study "the relative health risks associated with smoking
cigarettes . . . containing any substances commonly added . . .and report this
information to the Congress." In July 1980, under this authority, Richmond
wrote to the six major U.S. cigarette companies asking for "a list of those
substances which your firm uses in its brands."
There was international precedent for this request. The governments of
Canada and Great Britain have asked for, and received in confidence, the
contents of the secret blends of native brands. West Germany, too, monitors
Dr. Richmond wasn't asking for trade secrets; he wanted only a list of
additives. He received polite replies, but no specific information about any
substance added to any U.S. cigarette brand.
A second letter, in November 1980, elicited replies, again without specifics,
from two companies, American Tobacco and Brown & Williamson. They sent
Richmond copies of the "List of Permitted Additives to Tobacco Products" first
published in 1975 by the British Independent Scientific Committee on Smoking
and Health, an official government body. Neither company said whether it was
using any of the additives.
Yet the British list of approved substances, some 350 in all, contains a number
of known ammal carcinogens considered potentially hazardous to human
health—for example, coumarin. Extracted from tonka beans or from deertongue
leaves, or made synthetically, coumarin gives a sweet aroma to cigarette smoke
and a taste like that of fresh-cut hay. However, when tests in the mid-Igsos
showed coumarin to be a poison, causing liver and other organ damage, the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration removed it from the list of food and drug
additives "Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS)".
The American cigarette industry adheres to the GRAS list for its flavor
additives, and it started phasing out coumarin a few years after the FDA action.
However, the 1982 International Directory and Buyers' Guide of Tobacco
International lists 1 l suppliers of deertongue. And, according to one report,
suppliers are still selling it to several U.S. tobacco companies.
Several of the additives permitted on the British list—caramel, invert sugar,
eugenol, guaiacol— are, or produce, co-carcinogens during burning or
smoking. (Cocarcinogens increase the power of even trace amounts of
carcinogens to cause cancer.) Eugenol is suspected of being a carcinogen all by
itself; angelica-root extract, another British-approved additive, contains
carcinogenic substances; and orange-peel oil promotes tumors in mice. Also on
the British list are a number of additives, such as dodecan-5-olide and nonan-4-
olide, that give rise to carcinogens when heated.
Although the British committee was dangerously premature in approving some
poisons and cancer-causing chemicals as cigarette additives, it showed prudence
in one regard. It did not approve cocoa, a widely used tobacco flavor. In the
mid-1970s, the National Cancer Institute tested a variety of experimental
cigarettes, among them one flavored only with cocoa, and it proved to be
strongly tumorigenic: mice whose shaved backs were painted with tar from its
smoke developed many skin tumors. Results of such bioassays are assumed
indicative of harm to smokers. Thus, although cocoa powder makes a healthful
drink, smoke from cocoa burned in cigarettes could be hazardous.
Despite these findings, the U.S. cigarette industry is an important user of
cocoa. Of major flavorings used by tobacco manufacturers, various forms of
cocoa are particularly identified with U.S. brands of cigarettes.
Another major flavor in U.S. cigarettes is licorice. Practically all the licorice
extract produced in the United States, about 12 million pounds a year, goes into
tobacco. It adds flavor, helps keep tobacco moist and improves the burning
quality. Part of licorice extract is glycyrrhizic acid which, when burned, is a
precursor for cancer-causing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
Sugars (whether from cane, corn, beet or fruit) are the major flavor additives
used in U.S. cigarettes, making up about four percent of the tobacco by weight
in most U.S. brands since the early 1900S. When burned with tobacco, sugar
increases tar yield. Certain forms of sugar, such as caramel and invert sugar,
produce catechol when heated. This is "the major known co-carcinogen in
tobacco smoke," according to scientific publications by Dietrich Hoffmann,
associate director of the American Health Foundation.
To make aged tobacco workable and keep cigarettes fresh, chemicals known
as humectanes are added, the major ones being glycerol and the glycols.
According to a 1979 Surgeon General report: "Glycols are suspected to
influence the smoker's risk of bladder cancer."
In addition, burning transforms glycerol into a substance called acrolein
which suppresses the action of microscopic cilia that force irritants from the
lungs. As a result, the smoker's risk of chronic bronchitis and emphysema is
increased and the lungs are open to attack by toxins and carcinogens.
Thus, some of the major flavors and humectants known to be routinely added
to cigarettes in the last 70 years are dangerous or at best suspicious with regard
to human health. And what of the many synthetic flavors and fragrances devel-
oped to beef up the taste of new low-tar cigarettes? Could they be even more
hazardous than the additives we know about?
These are the questions Dr. Richmond asked, and for which he received no
Richmond has since left office. To date, inquiries into cigarette additives have
not been followed up by his successor, Dr. C. Everett Koop, but the subject has
not been allowed to languish. Dr. Edward N. Brandt, Jr., Assistant Secretary for
Health, and Dr. Joanne Luoto, acting head of that department's Of fice on
Smoking and Health, have been pursuing the Richmond lead and negotiating
with the tobacco industry. Horace Kornegay, chairman of The Tobacco
Institute, and Stanley Temko, of the firm of Covington and Burling, attorneys,
have been appointed by the six major manufacturers to represent them.
Kornegay and Temko have met several times with Brandt and Luoto, and have
submitted a proposal for releasing lists of additives used in U.S. cigarettes. But
the industry's plans are complex, hedged about with restrictions designed to
protect trade secrets. They fear the Freedom of Information Act might force the
government to reveal what tobacco companies give in confidence.
Nevertheless, a start appears to have been made. Let us hope our government
will not be deterred from pursuing a subject vital to the health of more than 5c
million Americans. As Dr. Richmond said in his November 1980 letter to the
cigarette manufacturers, "If the substances used pose no immediate or long-
term threat, that fact should be made known. If there is a threat, the substance
should not be used."
REPRINTED FROM THE JULY 1982 ISSUE OF READER'S DIGEST
(c) 1982 THE READER'S DIGEST ASSOCIATION, INC.,
PLEASANTVILLE, N.Y. 10570 PRINTED IN U.S.A.
This reprint does not constitute an endorsement, implied or otherwise by
Reader's Digest. It may not be Used in any way for advertising or promotional
purposes without prior written permission of Reader's Digest, The reprint may
not be sold by anyone other than Reader's Digest and no message, with the
exception ot the donor's name, may be imprinted on it.
For information on prices and availability of reprints write: Reprint Editor,
Reader's Digest, Pleasaarville, N.Y. 10570, or call: 914-769-7000.
Back One Step
95% of our orders are shipped the day they are received.
- You MUST be at least 18 years of age to purchase tobacco products in Tennessee!
- We do not sell tobacco products in Maine or Arizona.
- All Packages are shipped US Post Office unless you specify UPS.
- All Customers will be Charged for Shipping & Return Postage on any Refused or Returned package(s).
- International Customers: You are to check with your local customs & duty officials to see if there are additional duties or fees required, or if there are prohibitions on tobacco or amounts of tobacco which can be shipped to your country.
- Charge card customers may order by calling
- To check on an order call 865-436-4412, 9am-3pm Eastern Time Monday-Friday.
- Visit our showroom on D-Level of the Mountain Mall, on the corner of Parkway and River Road in Gatlinburg!
- We are open 7 days a week.
- Prices subject to change without prior notice.
- No Cash Refunds. Merchandise credit ONLY on returns.
- We DO NOT ship cigarettes.
603 Skyline Dr.
Gatlinburg, TN 37738
24hr Fax: 1-865-430-7476
© 2009 Gatlinburlier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
THE GATLINBURLIER DOES NOT SHIP CIGARETTES.
WARNING: This product contains nicotine. Nicotine is an addictive chemical.
OUR NEW OLD BLEND
As with any avalanche of lemons into one's life, survivors attempt to make lemonade and so it is with the Gatlinburlier Tobacconist. G&B Tobaccos new licensing and stature as a Tobacco Manufacturer now presents many opportunities for our loyal long-time customers. Not only does this new status make the Gatlinburlier the only truly legal tobacco retailer in the country, but it opens opportunities for us to expand our lines, since our access to specialty tobaccos has been vastly expanded. We plan to offer special deals on our new products as we produce new blends and attempt to improve some of our existing blends.
Tobacco being a natural product varies in characteristics year to year. It takes constant adjusting to keep blends consistent in taste, color, and burning qualities. In many cases blenders keep several years worth of tobaccos on hand so as to phase out one years product while phasing in another years crop to minimize the changes in the qualities of the blends. Over the 37 years that we have blended tobaccos some of our suppliers have left the business and other tobacco components have changed so much that we think we need to make adjustments to a few of our blends.
Gatlin-Burley our Americanized English once contained a very special Green River Valley tobacco which became unavailable. Given our new contacts within the industry we now have access to this rare tobacco, and have re blended this great blend, with just a touch of Latakia to meet its original qualities.
Gatlin-Burley was a blend created to keep the smoker's interest and encourage the maturation of the smoker's own tastes. Thirty-seven years ago it was our flag ship. It was an Americanized English that seemed to change taste as the smoker's pallet change over the course of one day and over the course of many weeks.
As a special short term offer we will send you a two ounce bag of this fabulous rebirth of greatness for only $5.95.
This extraordinary blend mixes fabulously with our Cades Cove Cavendish and our Chimney Smoke to make it even more tame for the American taste. For those looking to find a slightly more mature taste than is offered by our "natural aromatics" - Gatlin-Burley is the tobacco blend they are seeking, but "Made Even Better®".
2oz for only $5.95